<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A 400% Increase In Conversion Rate? Yep, It&#8217;s Possible!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppchero.com/a-400-increase-in-conversion-rate-yep-its-possible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppchero.com/a-400-increase-in-conversion-rate-yep-its-possible/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Pay Per Click Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Prince</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/a-400-increase-in-conversion-rate-yep-its-possible/comment-page-1/#comment-21582</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1304#comment-21582</guid>
		<description>Landing page is less of a factor with the recent QS update (Thank God!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Landing page is less of a factor with the recent QS update (Thank God!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/a-400-increase-in-conversion-rate-yep-its-possible/comment-page-1/#comment-21134</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1304#comment-21134</guid>
		<description>Hello Marc:

I just reviewed Google&#039;s documentation on the Quality Score here:

http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=46675

The elements that have an effect on the landing page Quality Score include load time, keyword density and perceived relevance to the search query. The number of links to the page or links to the homepage for the company or brand are not taken into account. 

In regards to organic search, yes - links are absolutely crucial. But not for paid search performance.

Best, 
Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Marc:</p>
<p>I just reviewed Google&#8217;s documentation on the Quality Score here:</p>
<p><a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=46675" rel="nofollow">http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=46675</a></p>
<p>The elements that have an effect on the landing page Quality Score include load time, keyword density and perceived relevance to the search query. The number of links to the page or links to the homepage for the company or brand are not taken into account. </p>
<p>In regards to organic search, yes &#8211; links are absolutely crucial. But not for paid search performance.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/a-400-increase-in-conversion-rate-yep-its-possible/comment-page-1/#comment-21120</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1304#comment-21120</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe,

This is exactly my point. 
We have always been told that google likes the landing page to have some other links on the page going to internal pages to help the quality score. 

It just seems like a page like this is great and will convert great, but the QS will be low so the campaign will be short lived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe,</p>
<p>This is exactly my point.<br />
We have always been told that google likes the landing page to have some other links on the page going to internal pages to help the quality score. </p>
<p>It just seems like a page like this is great and will convert great, but the QS will be low so the campaign will be short lived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/a-400-increase-in-conversion-rate-yep-its-possible/comment-page-1/#comment-21108</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1304#comment-21108</guid>
		<description>Hello Marc:
Thanks dropping us a comment. In regards to your comment:

It has less copy
--Yes, the page has less copy but it still has the keywords the client is advertising for so it should be okay.

It has no other links to the internal site pages
--We actually prefer our landing pages not to have additional navigation. This way you can keep users on the page and keep them conversion focused.

Possibly has no links to it from the main site as it is a standalone page.
--This speaks to the last note, not having links for the main page should be just fine for this landing page.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Marc:<br />
Thanks dropping us a comment. In regards to your comment:</p>
<p>It has less copy<br />
&#8211;Yes, the page has less copy but it still has the keywords the client is advertising for so it should be okay.</p>
<p>It has no other links to the internal site pages<br />
&#8211;We actually prefer our landing pages not to have additional navigation. This way you can keep users on the page and keep them conversion focused.</p>
<p>Possibly has no links to it from the main site as it is a standalone page.<br />
&#8211;This speaks to the last note, not having links for the main page should be just fine for this landing page.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/a-400-increase-in-conversion-rate-yep-its-possible/comment-page-1/#comment-21081</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1304#comment-21081</guid>
		<description>The only problem with this type of landing page (the winning one) is that it will most likely suffer from a poor QS. 
It has less copy
It has no other links to the internal site pages
Possibly has no links to it from the main site as it is a standalone page

How to you suggest we counter the effects of a poor quality score for a landing page like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with this type of landing page (the winning one) is that it will most likely suffer from a poor QS.<br />
It has less copy<br />
It has no other links to the internal site pages<br />
Possibly has no links to it from the main site as it is a standalone page</p>
<p>How to you suggest we counter the effects of a poor quality score for a landing page like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

