<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being #1 Doesn&#8217;t Always Mean You Win</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppchero.com/being-1-doesn%e2%80%99t-always-mean-you-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppchero.com/being-1-doesn%e2%80%99t-always-mean-you-win/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Pay Per Click Management</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kerschbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/being-1-doesn%e2%80%99t-always-mean-you-win/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kerschbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=49#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hello Ryan. I&#8217;ve found that the CTR does hold steady between positions #3 and #4 (and dips slight at #5). It really does depend on the industry, but this tends to hold true. I think you generate many more â€˜casual&#8217; browsers in positions #1-2 so your conversion rate may suffer, but the CTR for positions #3-4 are not much less and these users tend to be more qualified because are a bit deeper in the search (not much but a bit). And this idea relates to general, broad keywords. When biding on branded or product specific keywords it can be beneficial to rank higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Ryan. I&#8217;ve found that the CTR does hold steady between positions #3 and #4 (and dips slight at #5). It really does depend on the industry, but this tends to hold true. I think you generate many more â€˜casual&#8217; browsers in positions #1-2 so your conversion rate may suffer, but the CTR for positions #3-4 are not much less and these users tend to be more qualified because are a bit deeper in the search (not much but a bit). And this idea relates to general, broad keywords. When biding on branded or product specific keywords it can be beneficial to rank higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Marrs</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/being-1-doesn%e2%80%99t-always-mean-you-win/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Marrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=49#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Interesting conclusion. I&#8217;d be curious to see if those CTR are similar for being #3-#5 on a standard search result. Obviously being the #1 result on a targeted search is everyone&#8217;s desire, but is the amount of time &#038; effort vs. traffic really worth pushing that for extra SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting conclusion. I&#8217;d be curious to see if those CTR are similar for being #3-#5 on a standard search result. Obviously being the #1 result on a targeted search is everyone&#8217;s desire, but is the amount of time &#038; effort vs. traffic really worth pushing that for extra SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
