<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Now Including &#8220;Real Numbers&#8221; in the Keyword Tool Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppchero.com/google-now-including-real-numbers-in-the-keyword-tool-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppchero.com/google-now-including-real-numbers-in-the-keyword-tool-results/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Pay Per Click Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Willi</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/google-now-including-real-numbers-in-the-keyword-tool-results/comment-page-1/#comment-15496</link>
		<dc:creator>Willi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/google-now-including-real-numbers-in-the-keyword-tool-results/#comment-15496</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, for me it is also a very useful feature</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, for me it is also a very useful feature</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/google-now-including-real-numbers-in-the-keyword-tool-results/comment-page-1/#comment-15485</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/google-now-including-real-numbers-in-the-keyword-tool-results/#comment-15485</guid>
		<description>Well, from what I read today if Google gets enough feedback and suggestions on a particular feature they seriously consider adding it to their system. It couldn&#039;t hurt to drop them a line! Thanks for reading Shannee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, from what I read today if Google gets enough feedback and suggestions on a particular feature they seriously consider adding it to their system. It couldn&#8217;t hurt to drop them a line! Thanks for reading Shannee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaneeK</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/google-now-including-real-numbers-in-the-keyword-tool-results/comment-page-1/#comment-15482</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaneeK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/google-now-including-real-numbers-in-the-keyword-tool-results/#comment-15482</guid>
		<description>I just noticed this today too!  I&#039;ve found it really useful already when trying to beef up certain ad groups.  I&#039;m all for building out the long tail keywords, but a word that&#039;s only searched 18 times/month isn&#039;t likely to really improve a campaign!

It took me a minute to get used to it, but I&#039;m liking it....

Now, if they&#039;d just move position preferences to the campaign level!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed this today too!  I&#8217;ve found it really useful already when trying to beef up certain ad groups.  I&#8217;m all for building out the long tail keywords, but a word that&#8217;s only searched 18 times/month isn&#8217;t likely to really improve a campaign!</p>
<p>It took me a minute to get used to it, but I&#8217;m liking it&#8230;.</p>
<p>Now, if they&#8217;d just move position preferences to the campaign level!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
