• http://www.wordstream.com Rob

    John,

    Couldn’t agree more.

    Just because you may have set budget/targeting options doesn’t mean all Ad Groups belong in 1 Campaign. Makes it much easier to look for opportunities to improve/”optimize” when information is more detailed and specific.

    Great post!

  • http://www.ppchero.com John

    @ Rob,

    Thanks for the comment. I am definitely a fan of the “easier” factor in finding opportunities for improving my accounts.

  • Juice

    thank you for article… very important information for a noob.

  • http://www.wmaker.net Jerome

    John, thanks for your advice.

    I have a question following your example with a “shoes” campaign with 2 ad groups :
    1 – shoes
    2 – blue shoes

    In ad group 2, would you recommand to buy the keyword
    blue shoes (broad match) ?
    Or is it better to bid only on “blue shoes” and [blue shoes], because there is already a bid on shoes (broad match) in ad group 1 ?

  • http://www.ppchero.com John

    @ Jerome,

    Excellent question! We use a tactic here when performing very granular account optimizations that utilizes negative keywords to “force” Google to use the long tail variations of our keywords.

    First, to answer your question – you could simply place [blue shoes] in the second ad group and move on with your life. However, to maximize your keyword exposure, I would recommend the following:

    1. Use broad match in both.
    2. In the “shoes” ad group, ad -[blue shoes] as a negative exact match.
    3. In the “blue shoes” ad group, ad -[shoes] as a negative exact match.

    Like I said above, this forces Google to use the long tail version of your keyword while allowing you to be open to potentially relevant broad matched search queries!

Close
Hero Conf 2012