<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learn the Pros and Cons of Each PPC Search Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppchero.com/learn-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-ppc-search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppchero.com/learn-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-ppc-search-engine/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Pay Per Click Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:50:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AFFILIATE MARKETING &#171; Eric&#8217;s Marketing Webblog</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/learn-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-ppc-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-23233</link>
		<dc:creator>AFFILIATE MARKETING &#171; Eric&#8217;s Marketing Webblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1353#comment-23233</guid>
		<description>[...] main pay per click providers are Google Adwords, Yahoo! Search Marketingand Microsoft adcenter. PPC HERO reviews Google adword as delivering the most traffic, highest visiblity and contains the most user [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] main pay per click providers are Google Adwords, Yahoo! Search Marketingand Microsoft adcenter. PPC HERO reviews Google adword as delivering the most traffic, highest visiblity and contains the most user [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/learn-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-ppc-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-21576</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1353#comment-21576</guid>
		<description>@ Silv: Thanks for the comment! Good tip on Yahoo match types. And I&#039;ve found that the quality on Yahoo depends on the client. Some clients&#039; audience is geared toward Yahoo and some aren&#039;t. But this is definitely something to monitor when running a YSM campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Silv: Thanks for the comment! Good tip on Yahoo match types. And I&#8217;ve found that the quality on Yahoo depends on the client. Some clients&#8217; audience is geared toward Yahoo and some aren&#8217;t. But this is definitely something to monitor when running a YSM campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silv</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/learn-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-ppc-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-21567</link>
		<dc:creator>Silv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1353#comment-21567</guid>
		<description>@ Juice - give Google a go first - Yahoo is cheaper for a reason.
If you are going down the Yahoo road - ensure you take advantage of all the different techniques within it - advanced match instead of standard.

Unfortunately, the quality of Yahoo&#039;s search network has always been poor - getting better now - but was always rife with click fraud.

Google can be a great place to start - just make your terms really longtail - ensure you get the right campaign structure, match types and negatives - this will be more profitable than Yahoo (in most cases!)

Good article though guys

Silv (from the UK)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Juice &#8211; give Google a go first &#8211; Yahoo is cheaper for a reason.<br />
If you are going down the Yahoo road &#8211; ensure you take advantage of all the different techniques within it &#8211; advanced match instead of standard.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the quality of Yahoo&#8217;s search network has always been poor &#8211; getting better now &#8211; but was always rife with click fraud.</p>
<p>Google can be a great place to start &#8211; just make your terms really longtail &#8211; ensure you get the right campaign structure, match types and negatives &#8211; this will be more profitable than Yahoo (in most cases!)</p>
<p>Good article though guys</p>
<p>Silv (from the UK)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juice</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/learn-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-ppc-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-21469</link>
		<dc:creator>Juice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1353#comment-21469</guid>
		<description>As a noob I will start my campaign with yahoo first because of cheaper clicks and quality score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a noob I will start my campaign with yahoo first because of cheaper clicks and quality score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/learn-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-ppc-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-21443</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1353#comment-21443</guid>
		<description>Hello Fitz:
Thanks! Yes, we&#039;ll have to do a follow up post that does just that.
Thanks for the feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Fitz:<br />
Thanks! Yes, we&#8217;ll have to do a follow up post that does just that.<br />
Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fitz</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/learn-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-ppc-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-21441</link>
		<dc:creator>Fitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=1353#comment-21441</guid>
		<description>Informative article! I think you should also do a follow up that targets the 2nd tier PPCs like 7Search, Miva, Kanoodle, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Informative article! I think you should also do a follow up that targets the 2nd tier PPCs like 7Search, Miva, Kanoodle, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
