<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Contact Form Extensions Beta from Google – Super Cool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Pay Per Click Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Bounacos</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-142114</link>
		<dc:creator>George Bounacos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-142114</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s probably fun to play with.  If conversion rate is increased, I&#039;m for it.  I have no idea how a Google Haiku ad outperforms a well-done landing page, but wouldn&#039;t that be weird if it did?   Kind of takes one of the Quality Score issues &amp; throws it right out the window, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s probably fun to play with.  If conversion rate is increased, I&#8217;m for it.  I have no idea how a Google Haiku ad outperforms a well-done landing page, but wouldn&#8217;t that be weird if it did?   Kind of takes one of the Quality Score issues &amp; throws it right out the window, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-89858</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-89858</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the current status of this beta program?  Curious to know what Google&#039;s position is on the beta.

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the current status of this beta program?  Curious to know what Google&#8217;s position is on the beta.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bases de Datos</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-70319</link>
		<dc:creator>Bases de Datos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-70319</guid>
		<description>a logical step, first from impressions to clicks, now from clicks to lead generation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a logical step, first from impressions to clicks, now from clicks to lead generation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Gerwin</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-69865</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Gerwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-69865</guid>
		<description>If this feature will be optional for the #1 placed ad, it will be interesting to see what percentage of advertisers will enable it- especially if they&#039;re overbidding to stay #1 since this would force them to pay the maximum bid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this feature will be optional for the #1 placed ad, it will be interesting to see what percentage of advertisers will enable it- especially if they&#8217;re overbidding to stay #1 since this would force them to pay the maximum bid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-67196</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-67196</guid>
		<description>Amber,

When you call in with the special ID, and get &quot;re-routed&quot; is that a re-route to the customer without being given the prospect&#039;s actual phone number?  Or are you just given that phone number?  I would shutter to think how completely convoluted and extra-stepish this whole thing could become if that&#039;s the case.  

Complete insanity as far as I&#039;m concerned.  For anyone other than Google, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amber,</p>
<p>When you call in with the special ID, and get &#8220;re-routed&#8221; is that a re-route to the customer without being given the prospect&#8217;s actual phone number?  Or are you just given that phone number?  I would shutter to think how completely convoluted and extra-stepish this whole thing could become if that&#8217;s the case.  </p>
<p>Complete insanity as far as I&#8217;m concerned.  For anyone other than Google, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-66958</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-66958</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure getting people to bid more aggressively for top position in no way factored into Google&#039;s decision to roll this feature out.

IMO, this feature isn&#039;t very useful for most industries, but will increase click costs in every industry as DIY PPC managers that don&#039;t know any better will crank up their bids to capitalize on this &quot;innovation&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure getting people to bid more aggressively for top position in no way factored into Google&#8217;s decision to roll this feature out.</p>
<p>IMO, this feature isn&#8217;t very useful for most industries, but will increase click costs in every industry as DIY PPC managers that don&#8217;t know any better will crank up their bids to capitalize on this &#8220;innovation&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Dunlap</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-66950</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Dunlap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-66950</guid>
		<description>@amber - Less people will use it, but it have a better conversion rate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@amber &#8211; Less people will use it, but it have a better conversion rate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-66949</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-66949</guid>
		<description>Kind of, but you&#039;re not setting up a different amount to be charged for forms submitted, you&#039;ll be charged on your max CPC like you would if they simply clicked on your ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of, but you&#8217;re not setting up a different amount to be charged for forms submitted, you&#8217;ll be charged on your max CPC like you would if they simply clicked on your ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-66948</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-66948</guid>
		<description>when someone submits the form, they&#039;ll be expecting a sales associate to call them back. Sometimes, talking to an actual sales associate can convert more people than a landing page alone. It could go either way though, that&#039;s why it&#039;s in beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when someone submits the form, they&#8217;ll be expecting a sales associate to call them back. Sometimes, talking to an actual sales associate can convert more people than a landing page alone. It could go either way though, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s in beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cormac</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/new-contact-form-extensions-beta-from-google-super-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-66940</link>
		<dc:creator>Cormac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=4567#comment-66940</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any logic in this at all. 

This technique is taking the conversion AWAY from the landing page which is pretty much the bread of butter objective of all PPC campaigns. 

Sure, people will fill out the form but will they convert better by NOT visiting your landing page?

I doubt it. 

I actually can&#039;t think of a single practical use for this ad where using the PPC contact form would be better for both the user and the website owner than using the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any logic in this at all. </p>
<p>This technique is taking the conversion AWAY from the landing page which is pretty much the bread of butter objective of all PPC campaigns. </p>
<p>Sure, people will fill out the form but will they convert better by NOT visiting your landing page?</p>
<p>I doubt it. </p>
<p>I actually can&#8217;t think of a single practical use for this ad where using the PPC contact form would be better for both the user and the website owner than using the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

