<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Results of Our Second Tier PPC Search Engine Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/</link>
	<description>Heroic Feats of Pay Per Click Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:50:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diversify with Business.com: Great Results, New Enhancements » Closed Loop Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-40634</link>
		<dc:creator>Diversify with Business.com: Great Results, New Enhancements » Closed Loop Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-40634</guid>
		<description>[...] from Tier 2 engines are mixed as you can see from PPC Hero&#8217;s recent survey that asked &#8216;Which second tier PPC search engine has generated the best results for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Tier 2 engines are mixed as you can see from PPC Hero&#8217;s recent survey that asked &#8216;Which second tier PPC search engine has generated the best results for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-34233</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-34233</guid>
		<description>Pay per click is important but don&#039;t forget about pay per action AKA cost per action (CPA). Clients who use CPA affiliate marketing models pay ONLY for the clients they actually acquire, generating true ROI on every marketing dollar invested. It’s highly-targeted, low-risk and high-performance marketing at its best. My experience at hydranetwork has shown me that CPA reduces wasted ad dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay per click is important but don&#8217;t forget about pay per action AKA cost per action (CPA). Clients who use CPA affiliate marketing models pay ONLY for the clients they actually acquire, generating true ROI on every marketing dollar invested. It’s highly-targeted, low-risk and high-performance marketing at its best. My experience at hydranetwork has shown me that CPA reduces wasted ad dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben from Business.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-34206</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben from Business.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-34206</guid>
		<description>While its great to see the number of survey respondents who&#039;ve had a positive experience with Business.com, I agree with the comment from &quot;Lindsey&quot; on the initial post about this survey - we&#039;re in a vertical niche (business) which makes direct comparison between Business.com and general search engines (1st, 2nd or 3rd tier) difficult.

Our B2B advertisers rarely make an &quot;either-or&quot; comparison between advertising on general search engines and Business.com. They realize that both are essential for reaching business buyers online throughout the buying process:

General search engines provide traffic volume and often that &quot;last click&quot; navigational search visitor from a branded term.  ~69% of the US adult population used a general search engine in January &#039;09 (comScore) so search marketers need to figure out which general search engines work best - your survey contributes to the knowledge here. 

Business.com - a searchable directory + 30k business how-to guides - provides access to a high quality, concentrated audience of business buyers actively looking for solutions but who have not yet decided on a specific product/service/vendor. Lower traffic volume than from general search engines, of course, but very good CPA given audience quality.

For search marketers, I think it always comes down to the most effective ways to reach your target audience online throughout the buying process. Sites like Business.com, other vertical directory or search sites, etc. are places people go beyond general search engines to learn more but are not used or thought of as substitutes for general search engines. Again, its not &quot;either-or&quot;, its &quot;and&quot; when thinking about tier 1 general search engines and a vertical site like Business.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While its great to see the number of survey respondents who&#8217;ve had a positive experience with Business.com, I agree with the comment from &#8220;Lindsey&#8221; on the initial post about this survey &#8211; we&#8217;re in a vertical niche (business) which makes direct comparison between Business.com and general search engines (1st, 2nd or 3rd tier) difficult.</p>
<p>Our B2B advertisers rarely make an &#8220;either-or&#8221; comparison between advertising on general search engines and Business.com. They realize that both are essential for reaching business buyers online throughout the buying process:</p>
<p>General search engines provide traffic volume and often that &#8220;last click&#8221; navigational search visitor from a branded term.  ~69% of the US adult population used a general search engine in January &#8216;09 (comScore) so search marketers need to figure out which general search engines work best &#8211; your survey contributes to the knowledge here. </p>
<p>Business.com &#8211; a searchable directory + 30k business how-to guides &#8211; provides access to a high quality, concentrated audience of business buyers actively looking for solutions but who have not yet decided on a specific product/service/vendor. Lower traffic volume than from general search engines, of course, but very good CPA given audience quality.</p>
<p>For search marketers, I think it always comes down to the most effective ways to reach your target audience online throughout the buying process. Sites like Business.com, other vertical directory or search sites, etc. are places people go beyond general search engines to learn more but are not used or thought of as substitutes for general search engines. Again, its not &#8220;either-or&#8221;, its &#8220;and&#8221; when thinking about tier 1 general search engines and a vertical site like Business.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppc ninja review</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-34119</link>
		<dc:creator>ppc ninja review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-34119</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I&#039;d never even heard of those smaller ones before</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I&#8217;d never even heard of those smaller ones before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-34010</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-34010</guid>
		<description>@ Saravanan: Thanks! Yes, it appears that most people are sticking with the big 3!

@ Durward: Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Saravanan: Thanks! Yes, it appears that most people are sticking with the big 3!</p>
<p>@ Durward: Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Results of Our Second Tier PPC Search Engine Survey : Virtual Real Estate Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33999</link>
		<dc:creator>Results of Our Second Tier PPC Search Engine Survey : Virtual Real Estate Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-33999</guid>
		<description>[...] Source:Results of Our Second Tier PPC Search Engine Survey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source:Results of Our Second Tier PPC Search Engine Survey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Durward Sobek</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33966</link>
		<dc:creator>Durward Sobek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-33966</guid>
		<description>I cannot expect the same survey results. But Good to know about the use of search engines and change in trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot expect the same survey results. But Good to know about the use of search engines and change in trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clickbank Diet Product Adds Google AdWords Tracking For Affiliates</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33959</link>
		<dc:creator>Clickbank Diet Product Adds Google AdWords Tracking For Affiliates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-33959</guid>
		<description>[...] Results of Our Second Tier PPC Search Engine Survey &#124; The &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Results of Our Second Tier PPC Search Engine Survey | The &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saravanan</title>
		<link>http://www.ppchero.com/secondtier-survery-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33886</link>
		<dc:creator>Saravanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppchero.com/?p=2942#comment-33886</guid>
		<description>so its seems that still the big3(google,yahoo,msn) are ppl looking. 
good survey..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so its seems that still the big3(google,yahoo,msn) are ppl looking.<br />
good survey..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
