5

Quality Score & How It Affects the Bottom Line For Ecommerce Advertisers

Developing a solid pay-per-click campaign takes time. Unfortunately, you can’t just launch a new campaign and forget about it, which is one of the many reasons we take so much pride in what we do for our clients. One of the key metrics we tend to focus on in paid search is Quality Score. Essentially, Quality Score measures the relevancy between your keywords, ads, landing pages and consumer search queries. Google places a lot of emphasis on providing the best user search experience possible, so Quality Score helps them achieve that.

For ecommerce advertisers, paying close attention to Quality Score becomes particularly important because it affects your keyword costs and returns on ad spend (ROAS). On one hand, higher Quality Scores will yield lesser click costs and therefore lead to an increase in ROAS. On the other hand, lower Quality Scores will likely decrease your ROAS as a result of higher click costs. For the purpose of this post, we will go into more detail as to exactly how Quality Score affects ecommerce advertisers.

 

KNOW THE VALUE OF EACH CLICK

Typically, advertisers have a goal in mind when starting a PPC campaign. Lead generation clients tend to be focused more on lead volume and an overall CPA goal.  Ecommerce advertisers, however, tend to focus on volume as well, but varying CPA goals for each product. This is why it becomes so important to pay attention to performance at the keyword level since they are trying to manage multiple CPA targets.

A good place to start analyzing keyword performance for ecommerce clients is to know the value of each click. First, determine your revenue per click by taking your PPC revenue and dividing it by the total number of clicks over the same timeframe. Then divide revenue per click by your goal ROAS to get a feel for the highest amount you should bid on a keyword to maintain that ROAS. This strategy assumes that all keywords are equal, but nonetheless provides a good framework for determining if your CPC bids are below, on par, or exceeding what you should be paying.

 

HOW QS AFFECTS CLICK COSTS & AD POSITION

Now that we know the value of each click, we can take a more in-depth look at how Quality Score affects your click costs and ad position. Since we know that Google ad rank is calculated as the product of your maximum CPC bid and Quality Score, you can see that QS will influence your click costs, and therefore ad position as well. Consider the following table, using our suggested keyword bid from the previous example:

Assuming our keyword bids remain constant, Quality Score becomes the variable that influences ad rank. This is the formula that Google uses to determine the position of your ad on the search results pages. Obviously, the higher the ad rank, the better off you will be.

Taking this a step further, let’s compare the click costs of two advertisers in the same ad auction with different Quality Scores:

As you can see, the lower Quality Score for Advertiser A forces that individual to bid much higher to achieve an ad rank of 5. On the other hand, Advertiser B has a much higher Quality Score and therefore ends up paying much less to maintain the same ad rank. Let’s see how this ties into overall ROAS:

Assuming that everything in the table above is constant (except CPC), you can see from the calculations above that lower Quality Scores can be detrimental to overall ROAS performance. Whereas Advertiser B’s ROAS is looking pretty good here, Advertiser A’s suffered as a result of more expensive click costs, originating from poor Quality Scores.

 

CLOSING THOUGHTS

In closing, this is why it becomes very important for ecommerce advertisers to pay close attention to Quality Score. Not only will you provide a better search experience for your potential customers, but you can also free up extra budget by saving on click costs. So, how have you used QS for optimizing your own ecommerce campaigns? Feel free to leave any feedback below, and as always, thanks for reading.

About the Author

Dave @daverosborough

Dave is an Account Manager at Hanapin Marketing, a search engine marketing firm focused on account growth and improving performance results through pay-per-click advertising.
  • Aldo

    Thanks Dave for clarifying the relation between QS and CPC

    I am pretty sure that in so many cases, your keyword bid could affect the QS. I am not meaning about the ad position, sometimes I want to buy a Keyword but I don’t get a good QS, so I just increase my bid and… I don’t know how but I get a higger QS :-)

    • http://twitter.com/daverosborough Dave Rosborough

      Aldo,

      You bring up a good point and what you’re seeing isn’t by coincidence. In many cases, QS will improve over time with higher than average CPC bids. This is likely due to your increased CPCs relation to higher ad positions that also yield higher CTRs. Since CTR is one of the primary metrics used in Google’s QS calculation, better CTRs are favored by the system and therefore given higher QS as well. In fact, I’ve heard some people use this as a bidding strategy for new keywords. This could be one explanation for what you are seeing, hope that helps.

  • Curtis Worthington

    Great post dave.

    • http://twitter.com/daverosborough Dave Rosborough

      Appreciate the kind words, Curtis. Thanks for reading.

  • http://www.jchweb.co.uk/ Jack Hutchinson

    I find CTR and Ad Text have the biggest effect on quality score. Make sure your negatives are up to date by block irrelevant search terms and use tight ad groups to make your ads as relevant as possible and you’ll find your quality score improves!

    • http://twitter.com/daverosborough Dave Rosborough

      Jack,

      These are all great points, we tend to see the same things on our end. Thanks for reading!

  • Ben

    Hi Dave,
    The QS table does not make sense to me. This is saying your ad rank will be lower with the keyword having a higher QS with the $0.67 bid? Am I missing something?

    • http://twitter.com/daverosborough Dave Rosborough

      Ben,

      Thanks for reading. I apologize if anything came off as confusing, but you actually have it the other way around. In a nut shell, the tables above work together to show that higher QS’s can save you money on click costs and improve your ROAS in the long run.

      I think what you might be missing here is the fact that Ad Rank is constant and QS is the variable in my scenario above. As a result, you can see that the advertiser with the $2.50 CPC bid has to pay much more for each click compared to the advertiser with the $0.67 CPC bid to achieve that same Ad Rank (constant) because of their different QS’s (variable).

      I’d be more than happy to provide more clarification if needed. Hope this helps!

    • http://twitter.com/daverosborough Dave Rosborough

      Ben,

      Thanks for reading. I apologize if anything came off as confusing, but you actually have it the other way around. In a nut shell, the tables above work together to show that higher QS’s can save you money on click costs and improve ROAS in the long run.

      I think what you might be missing here is the fact that Ad Rank is the constant and QS is the variable in my scenario above. As a result, you can see how the advertiser with the $2.50 CPC has to bid much higher than the advertiser with the $0.67 CPC to achieve the same Ad Rank (constant) because of their different QS’s (variable).

      I’d be more than happy to provide more clarification if needed. Hope this helps!

  • http://twitter.com/PPCNI Jordan McClements

    I agree with the article and the comments 99%.
    I know I am being a wee bit pedantic, but, as I understand it…

    Negative keywords do not affect QS.

    Higher max CPCs do not affect QS.

    (OK if you have great ads with a great CTR relative to other ads in the same position – you will see the improvement in QS more quickly if you have really high bids rather than really low bids – but only because your ad is in a position where it will get enough clicks to allow Google to decide that it has a good CTR compared to other ads in the same position in a shorter time frame. This is definitely not the same as saying that higher CPCs improve QS).

    • http://twitter.com/daverosborough Dave Rosborough

      Jordan,

      Thanks for the comment, you bring up some good points. Although we know that negatives and max CPCs do not affect QS directly, it’s the indirect effects we’re concerned with here. In fact, I think you did a great job explaining some of these indirect effects in your comment above. However, if you would have said that they have no influence on QS whatsoever, I would have disagreed. Thanks for sharing.

      • Guest

        I think he’s talking about the 2nd image. If it’s truly the way you want it to be, it’s highly confusing. Higher quality score with a constant cpc should give a higher position…

        • http://twitter.com/daverosborough Dave Rosborough

          I apologize for the confusion, but you’ve basically reiterated my point here. Regardless of which metric you keep constant (QS or CPC), an increase in the variable metric will result in a higher position.

        • http://twitter.com/daverosborough Dave Rosborough

          Also, when I say “Ad Rank”, I’m referring to Google’s behind-the-scenes value calculation used in each auction to determine an ads position. In other words, Ad Rank and Ad Position are two different things.