• http://www.wordstream.com Rob

    John,

    Couldn’t agree more.

    Just because you may have set budget/targeting options doesn’t mean all Ad Groups belong in 1 Campaign. Makes it much easier to look for opportunities to improve/”optimize” when information is more detailed and specific.

    Great post!

  • http://www.ppchero.com John

    @ Rob,

    Thanks for the comment. I am definitely a fan of the “easier” factor in finding opportunities for improving my accounts.

  • Juice

    thank you for article… very important information for a noob.

  • http://www.wmaker.net Jerome

    John, thanks for your advice.

    I have a question following your example with a “shoes” campaign with 2 ad groups :
    1 – shoes
    2 – blue shoes

    In ad group 2, would you recommand to buy the keyword
    blue shoes (broad match) ?
    Or is it better to bid only on “blue shoes” and [blue shoes], because there is already a bid on shoes (broad match) in ad group 1 ?

  • http://www.ppchero.com John

    @ Jerome,

    Excellent question! We use a tactic here when performing very granular account optimizations that utilizes negative keywords to “force” Google to use the long tail variations of our keywords.

    First, to answer your question – you could simply place [blue shoes] in the second ad group and move on with your life. However, to maximize your keyword exposure, I would recommend the following:

    1. Use broad match in both.
    2. In the “shoes” ad group, ad -[blue shoes] as a negative exact match.
    3. In the “blue shoes” ad group, ad -[shoes] as a negative exact match.

    Like I said above, this forces Google to use the long tail version of your keyword while allowing you to be open to potentially relevant broad matched search queries!